Meet your
new associate.
RE: Mutual NDA for Project Alpine — attached for review
4.2 Indemnification. The Receiving Party shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Disclosing Party from any claims arising from unauthorized disclosure...
9.3 Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of five (5) years from the Effective Date. This obligation is non-mutual...
Deviation Report
3 foundNon-standard indemnification. Unilateral obligation not in firm playbook.
Playbook rule: mutual-indem-required
Missing residual knowledge carve-out. Standard clause absent.
Playbook rule: residual-knowledge
Non-mutual 5yr term exceeds 2yr threshold. Requires partner approval.
Playbook rule: max-term-24mo
Built on a five-stage methodology — Audit, Architect, Build, Deploy, Operate — adapted for the workflow density, regulatory posture, and confidentiality requirements of mid-sized law firms.
Built for
4.2 Indemnification. The Receiving Party shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Disclosing Party from any claims arising from unauthorized disclosure...
9.3 Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for a period of five (5) years from the Effective Date. This obligation is non-mutual...
Deviation Summary
Non-standard indemnification
Missing residual knowledge carve-out
Non-mutual 5yr term exceeds 2yr threshold
NDA Review
Review the NDA.
Flag the deviations.
Route the redline.
Data Room
Contracts — Extraction Summary
47 of 47 completeDiligence Summaries
Ingest the data room.
Extract by category.
Cite every source.
Smith v. TechCorp Holdings, Inc.
Del. Ch., C.A. No. 2024-0312 (2024)
...the Court held that a non-compete clause lacking geographic limitation was unenforceable under Delaware law when...
Non-Compete Enforceability Memo
Internal — M. Chen, Oct 2023
...Delaware courts apply a three-part reasonableness test: (1) geographic scope, (2) temporal duration, (3) scope of restricted activity...
Johnson Engagement — NCA Analysis
Matter 2023-0847 — Redline + Final
...recommended narrowing the restricted territory to the Mid-Atlantic region and reducing the non-compete period from 24 to 12 months...
Precedent Search
Search the repository.
Surface prior work.
Stop reinventing.
Your client data stays in your environment. Agents deploy inside your firm’s infrastructure. No exceptions without your written consent.
See what an agent workforce could look like inside your firm.
A short conversation. We’ll talk through how work moves through your firm today, where the time tax lives, and what workflows would fit an agent system inside your specific practice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Mid-sized law firms between 50 and 500 attorneys. Our deepest workflow library covers corporate & M&A, real estate, litigation, and insurance defense practices. The underlying methodology applies to any practice area with high-volume, repeatable, review-gated work.
Your senior sponsor and operational lead spend about 15–25 hours across the engagement — interviews during Audit, design review during Architect, UAT during Deploy, training session at go-live. We handle the technical work; your firm provides the context only you have.
A 30-minute working conversation. We’ll review one or two workflows you’d most want to see an agent handle, talk through the systems involved, and outline what an Audit engagement would cover. No slides, no sales deck.
Agents deploy inside your firm’s infrastructure by default. Your client data does not leave your environment. Audit logging is tamper-evident and aligned to your records-retention policy. We work to your firm’s existing security and governance framework, not around it.
Most engagements move from Audit to a production agent in 4–8 weeks for a single agent, or 10–16 weeks for a multi-agent workforce across one or two practice areas.
Yes — that’s the point. Every engagement is bespoke to your firm’s playbooks, templates, house style, and integrations. The methodology is consistent; the agents are not.
No. Agents handle production tasks — review, extract, flag, route, draft, check. Your attorneys exercise judgment on the work product, the same way they review output from a supervised associate. The agent handles throughput; your attorneys handle decisions.
Four tiers. The Audit ranges from $5K to $15K. Single-agent deployments from $40K to $80K. Multi-agent workforce deployments from $150K to $350K. Ongoing operation runs $8K to $25K per month based on workforce size. Pricing is anchored to the value of work replaced, not engineering hours.